quick dash scoring manual

0 -1.30001 TD 0 Tw 383.6465 161.7375 385.2908 164.2038 386.216 166.9787 c 321.5602 92.2407 l 350.7921 91.7983 350.3859 91.559 349.8058 91.559 c 360.9854 94.9233 l 277.2184 85.3144 l 0 Tw /GS2 gs 257.483 97.414 l 419.6162 607.1422 l 349.7916 91.8852 m f 266.0258 106.1108 l 402.7617 411.4683 403.1727 425.5475 399.9868 437.8802 c 267.3138 92.6406 267.6339 92.0561 268.3859 92.0561 c 250.9357 96.1494 248.7897 90.4638 247.7018 87.5844 c 249.516 96.2597 249.7918 96.2597 v 10 0 0 10 243.3623 554.046 Tm 326.548 103.1474 m 289.2675 104.8144 m 402.659 186.9162 401.7342 187.2245 400.912 187.1218 c 320.2697 101.9003 320.7555 102.1543 321.0309 102.5673 c 396.9039 174.8918 394.6429 174.1729 392.3822 173.7616 c )]TJ /CS0 cs 0.05 scn T* 234.8873 101.2778 235.6432 102.0336 236.5758 102.0336 c Manual therapy 16(2): 177-182. -0.0112 Tc /GS3 gs 0.15 scn 434.5175 453.7064 m 342.549 91.6318 l f 0 0 0 1 k f 382.1047 96.1703 382.3105 94.8345 382.208 93.4982 c 292.5319 92.1284 l [(pr)20(oper)9(ties could be maintained. Original Editor - Nicole Wente as part of the Temple University EBP Project, Top Contributors - Nicole Wente, Admin, Rachael Lowe, Kim Jackson, Abbey Wright, Scott A Burns, Laura Ritchie, Rucha Gadgil, Lauren Lopez, Tony Lowe, Evan Thomas, Scott Buxton, WikiSysop, Claire Knott and Robin Tacchetti, The Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) questionnaire is a 30-item questionnaire that looks at the ability of a patient to perform certain upper extremity activities. 316.9708 91.9794 l /F12 1 Tf 370.6349 101.9726 l J Orthop Sci 19(2): 218-222. 0 Tc q Q ET 339.1847 91.8852 339.5977 92.1684 339.8737 92.5234 c 241.4633 87.5952 l In comparison to the original 30 item DASH outcome measure, the QuickDASH only contains 11 items[5] It is a questionnaire that measures an individuals ability to complete tasks, absorb forces, and severity of symptoms[5]The QuickDASH tool uses a 5-point Likert scale from which the patient can select an appropriate number corresponding to his/her severity/function level.[6]. 282.411 85.3144 m 266.0258 101.9023 l 456.2023 356.5891 m 292.1635 101.038 291.3073 101.8061 291.3073 102.9663 c 289.4596 95.1445 289.8117 94.9126 289.8117 94.4804 c 36 346.398 m Q 341.6935 102.3354 l 287.7633 101.8784 l 415.8135 396.1554 413.5527 398.2109 411.8053 401.8078 c q /GS3 gs "Assessing Validity of the< i> Quick DASH and SF-12 as Surveillance Tools among Workers with Neck or Upper Extremity Musculoskeletal Disorders." (INSTITUTE FOR WORK & HEAL)Tj (Quick)Tj 0.026 Tw BT Upper Extremity Musculoskeletal Disorders, Gabel (2009; n=137; mean age=48.4(15.6) years; with clinician referral): SEM=7.38, Polson (2010; n=35; mean age=48.7(15.7) years): MDC=11, Neck & Upper Extremity Musculoskeletal Disorders, Fan (2008; n=231; mean age=39.5(0.5) years; clinical diagnosis or symptoms present): MCID=10, Gabel (2009):Excellenttest-retest reliability (ICC=0.94), Polson (2010):Excellenttest-retest reliability (ICC=0.94), Gummesson (2006; n=105; mean age=52; symptoms more than 2 months):Excellenttest-retest reliability (ICC=0.93), Franchignoni (2011; n=283; mean age=52.3(15.9) years):Excellentitem separation reliability (ICC=0.99), Shoulder, Elbow & Wrist Arthroplasty Patients, Angst (2009; n=320):Excellenttest-retest reliability(ICC=0.93), Gummesson (2006):Excellentinternal consistency (Chronbach alpha=0.92), Franchignoni (2011):Goodinternal consistency (Chronbach alpha=0.87), Angst (2009):Excellentinternal consistency (Cronbach alpha=0.92, Neck & Upper Extremity Musculoskeletal DisordersFan (2008), Moderatecorrelation with PCS-12 (r=-0.44), Neck & Upper Extremity Musculoskeletal DisordersFan (2008), Upper Extremity Musculoskeletal DisordersGummesson (2006). f (Optional Modules)Tj 313.4039 81.9643 l 0.026 Tw BT 0 -1.3 TD Tj 0 0 0 1 k 253.2826 92.0952 m BT Beaton DE, Katz JN, Fossel AH, Wright JG, Tarasuk V, Bombardier C. Beaton DE, Davis AM, Hudak P, McConnell S. Matheson LN, Melhorn JM, Mayer TG, Theodore BR, Gatchel RJ. )Tj [(DASH is a shor)10(tened version)]TJ /GS3 gs 273.3541 82.3383 272.8502 81.538 271.578 81.538 c 291.3073 104.1264 292.1635 104.8945 293.2995 104.8945 c 0 0 0 1 K 268.298 104.5024 268.4979 104.6464 268.714 104.7426 c 576 497.055 l (2009). 376.9666 92.2649 378.2 92.1623 378.9192 92.0596 c 428.9683 617.419 432.1538 619.3718 436.265 619.166 c (ding to two criteria: first, the)Tj f 292.5638 94.3046 l 241.1015 97.4126 l BMC musculoskeletal disorders 10(1): 161. 443.1502 612.7941 m 253.2826 97.6328 253.2826 101.6997 y f 398.7536 259.5741 399.0621 262.4522 399.9868 264.6102 c 0 0 0 1 k 252.129 96.0405 252.129 92.0952 y 269.6581 103.9106 269.4178 104.1264 269.0819 104.1264 c 0 0 0 1 k 265.9457 94.3046 l (Quick)Tj 326.9757 101.5742 326.1856 102.27 326.1856 103.2417 c 268.6979 101.1181 l BT BT 343.1866 106.5546 l Show details How it works Open the quick dash pdf and follow the instructions Easily sign the quickdash pdf with your finger Send filled & signed quick dash or save Rate the quickdash scoring 4.8 Satisfied 75 votes 248.7897 90.4638 250.9357 96.1494 250.9777 96.2597 c 398.7536 108.6057 398.2398 110.4553 398.0346 113.0244 c 452.3994 618.2412 448.6998 616.5968 445.3085 614.2332 c /F12 1 Tf 1 g 372.3417 141.3891 371.2116 141.4917 370.492 142.1086 c /GS3 gs f -0.011 Tc q 249.6812 95.9702 247.4725 90.1792 247.2877 89.6938 c 4 w T* 10 0 0 10 468.8496 453.2083 Tm 272.8102 93.8247 272.5302 94.0566 272.4823 94.3525 c 339.8228 91.8564 339.2575 91.559 338.6266 91.559 c /F12 1 Tf 381.7968 134.5034 m 0.80348 0 Td T* Scoring Patients are asked to answer all sections and respond based on their ability to perform activities over the past week; only one answer per question. 274.8583 104.8144 l 406.7698 227.6129 407.6946 240.9731 411.3942 253.2027 c 400.2952 267.1793 400.3979 262.349 399.8842 256.6965 c 341.6495 103.8359 l 399.8842 256.6965 m 358.9913 91.6318 l 361.5001 102.3354 l The QuickDASH, published in 2005 in the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, is a subset of 11 items from the 30-item DASH and is a self-reported questionnaire in which the response options are presented as 5-point Likert scales. 235.7337 89.0483 235.9357 89.0483 v [(V)90(AS of ability to work)-8725(r = 0.76)-15679(r = 0.77)]TJ 0.78462 0 Td DASH are added to form the raw, or ac-tual, score. -37.2 -10.63366 TD 0 0 0 1 k 241.1015 97.4126 l (V)Tj (items that r)Tj 281.3226 82.3784 l 315.318 104.5683 316.4777 104.5971 316.4777 105.5835 c 10 0 0 10 262.4564 334.8635 Tm /CS2 cs 1 scn /GS2 gs (consists of only four items. 10 0 0 10 54.9526 581.6966 Tm ET q 378.7136 176.9476 380.6663 177.5641 382.1047 176.2282 c S 36 725.5079 m 428.7626 486.7985 429.7904 497.6923 426.3987 508.1745 c 375.4562 94.6694 m 275.4264 84.6264 275.0743 84.0825 275.0743 83.4902 c (items theor)Tj -0.59287 -1.30001 TD f 273.8505 94.0805 273.5304 93.8247 273.1622 93.8247 c 333.6818 81.9428 l /GS2 gs [(average scor)20(e; r \320 Pearson pr)19(oduct moment corr)20(elation)]TJ 330.6447 82.1894 l 390.3267 87.6404 392.0738 88.3598 393.6154 87.8457 c -4.24707 -1.3 TD 5.39948 0.00001 TD 427.8376 249.5031 424.3433 239.74 419.8214 230.2847 c /GS3 gs -0.78458 -1.3 TD 316.4561 106.8808 316.8693 106.2793 316.8693 105.6269 c 272.4342 94.3525 l BT Arthritis care & research 63(S11): S174-S188. -0.0001 Tc 429.6873 523.7957 m (r)Tj 235.7018 98.8042 235.0094 99.4965 235.0094 100.3501 c 333.6314 104.9379 l 264.3937 106.1108 l T* 231.6825 81.7065 l ((Rasch Analysis))Tj 421.5685 608.9918 422.4938 613.4109 425.8851 615.7748 c 298.9081 91.5522 298.4201 91.2402 297.7321 91.2402 c 386.8322 92.3569 387.4406 91.8852 388.1945 91.8852 c 387.5518 560.1761 388.1684 565.7257 389.4014 570.8641 c 369.7726 138.82 370.081 140.6695 368.5393 140.4642 c ET q 387.0382 188.5604 m q 350.5675 94.9956 351.1837 94.4448 351.1691 94.227 c Nakamoto, H., Y. Oshima, et al. T* ET 272.6742 102.3745 l Scoring the DASH 30-item disability/symptom section: q 297.1242 92.3281 297.412 92.0722 297.7882 92.0722 c 386.7297 190.513 386.1129 190.9242 385.8049 191.3353 c Tj /CS2 cs 1 scn 328.3317 81.9428 l 251.0917 302.6637 m ET 265.3378 94.3046 l 0 0 0 1 k 336.234 91.6318 l -0.0002 Tc 451.7831 619.2687 461.9574 626.1542 473.4674 629.6487 c 412.2164 127.7208 l 279.6989 96.3608 l 401.7342 364.3996 401.7342 365.6329 402.5563 366.5576 c Q /CS0 cs 0.7 scn 474.7007 484.1264 472.748 482.071 470.7953 479.913 c Q (of 30 items, the )Tj 365.255 105.0107 365.9367 104.2275 365.9367 103.1474 c /F12 1 Tf 0 Tw /GS2 gs 0.84055 0 Td 385.9076 167.9036 383.4412 165.1287 382.208 161.84 c /GS3 gs 396.2871 142.6222 397.4176 138.5115 398.0346 133.4759 c 278.8746 105.4624 l 339.0763 94.9956 339.4313 94.8432 339.7579 94.5463 c 0 -1.30001 TD "Internal consistency and validity of the QuickDASH instrument for upper extremity injuries in older children." 299.5802 94.4165 l 284.5072 91.288 m 385.4611 92.5522 l 340.0841 93.8212 l 314.2521 93.2773 l 325.6202 84.3134 l [(highest corr)20(elation with the 30-)]TJ 382.4133 281.3616 385.8049 312.6036 393.5122 341.0711 c /GS3 gs 419.9242 123.9182 422.0827 115.594 422.0827 107.9888 c 283.3309 82.3383 283.4591 82.3061 283.6911 82.3222 c 10 0 0 10 468.1954 349.2083 Tm 239.6576 96.2597 239.3822 96.2597 v ET 395.5681 509.0997 396.6982 499.3367 393.2043 491.6288 c /GS3 gs 377.275 76.3357 376.6582 77.8773 376.0418 79.2132 c /F12 1 Tf 314.4191 86.851 l h 252.129 101.6997 l [(based on similarity acr)20(oss domains. 385.188 144.3691 387.8604 155.0576 390.2237 165.9509 c [(patients, and second, corr)20(elation with)]TJ f 0 -1.3 TD 0.026 Tw To calculate a QuickDASH score, at least 10 of the 11 items must be completed. 290.1873 106.0947 l 383.1193 104.3579 382.7061 104.6845 382.1554 104.6845 c 365.4943 104.1987 364.8351 104.6845 364.1173 104.6845 c 321.4727 83.4433 m 442.02 446.2043 m 314.4552 101.6464 l endstream endobj 16 0 obj << /Length 6059 >> stream weaknesses of the DASH and Quick-DASH have been well investigated by both classical test theory. f 247.7008 87.5815 l 249.6812 95.9702 247.4725 90.1792 247.2877 89.6938 c 265.9696 97.1445 l 365.0743 94.0678 l (DASH)Tj The high correlation between Quick-DASH score and patient satisfaction and functional outcome indicates that the Quick-DASH questionnaire is a suitable tool for evaluating adult humeral shaft fracture outcomes. The latter part of the questionnaire rates your symptoms and impact on work and sport using a similar scale. 1.00536 0 Td (The assigned values for all completed)Tj 285.3551 102.5502 l 286.9071 85.3383 287.1393 85.3945 287.4113 85.3945 c 313.7955 84.538 l 424.6518 244.467 419.7189 233.5738 415.2997 222.4743 c 1 by U.S. News & World Report for 31st Consecutive Year, Community-Ready Upper Extremity Interactive Rehabilitation, Dr. Lieber To Receive AACPDM's Lifetime Achievement Award for Research on Cerebral Palsy, Global Advisory Services Hospital Training & Consulting, Medical Student Education & Residency Program, Bundled Webinars: Spinal Cord Injury (3 Titles), 1 Year Webinar Package - Unlimited Access, Quick Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder & Hand, Making Waves Following a Spinal Cord Injury, Full Circle After a Non-Traumatic Brain Injury, An Unanticipated Head Injury and Incredibly Bright Future. 279.2826 81.6181 m /F2 1 Tf DASH and Quick DASH Scoring Formula = ( [ (sum of n responses)/n] -1) (25) where n represents the number of completed items. [1], Many of these versions have had or are in the process of being tested for their psychometric properties. ET 447.9803 424.7254 453.119 415.3734 456.716 405.3021 c (Quick)Tj Q (DASH)Tj S 355.8956 103.0893 l 145.3307 439.5741 l f 410.9837 185.066 408.7225 176.7418 413.8611 171.0895 c 265.4337 101.9023 l 383.0977 94.6694 382.4601 94.1401 382.38 93.4585 c Q 1 1 1 1 K 316.275 96.8662 l 474.8032 603.6478 476.756 606.217 478.6061 608.8892 c 373.0206 91.6318 l [(techniques described. (TH 2006. 268.6979 101.8784 l T* 313.7882 91.9794 l 369.0402 106.8808 l 291.9078 91.3681 l (SRM - standar)Tj 281.8668 85.3144 l 287.0272 94.3046 l 379.1397 101.9726 l 315.9708 81.9643 l 430.3042 373.3406 m 319.0734 104.6845 318.4357 104.1552 318.3556 103.4736 c /GS3 gs 321.5743 92.2407 m q f 452.1942 368.7161 451.9885 364.9133 451.2689 361.4194 c 0 Tc /GS3 gs 333.6314 104.3437 l q 354.7501 104.6118 l 396.5956 591.9319 398.9594 597.2761 402.8644 601.4897 c 0 -1.3 TD 362.7111 103.1474 l 322.8727 101.6464 l 288.3954 92.1284 l 343.9992 94.5971 l f [(www)125(.dash.iwh.on.ca. 332.7614 86.5249 l 355.0983 96.8662 l 336.379 104.9379 l Q f /GS3 gs Q 374.507 103.4736 m 331.3766 91.6318 l 343.4113 94.5971 l 407.7976 211.8889 m 312.7804 81.6167 l 397.3151 117.6493 395.5681 112.3054 396.0818 105.317 c 324.4674 94.5971 l 407.9004 150.5358 402.9675 157.9351 403.1727 166.3624 c 247.7018 106.853 m (=)Tj J Hand Surg Am 39(1): 100-107. [(incr)20(easing in popularity since its r)19(elease)]TJ 363.2111 91.958 l BT 0 Tw s 0.80348 0 Td 322.5099 104.5249 322.8439 105.0107 323.6774 105.0107 c ET f 312.7804 101.6464 l s 349.4943 106.5332 l Study design: Validity study. 0 0 0 0 k S ET 426.8098 529.6536 419.5131 525.1317 412.011 524.618 c 373.9863 151.1521 l h 292.3153 102.0781 292.8114 101.8061 293.3795 101.8061 c 0.58051 0 Td 351.1837 94.227 l 330.2819 84.582 l /F12 1 Tf 356.1349 96.518 l T* 2.89348 -0.00537 TD With 30+ sites in Illinois, we may be closer than you think! BT (b)Tj /GS3 gs 335.299 91.958 l 336.9738 101.9726 l 330.9054 81.6167 l 290.1873 104.8144 l 386.7306 101.9003 387.216 102.1543 387.4913 102.5673 c /F11 1 Tf 10 0 0 10 408 646.6965 Tm 321.1398 104.1987 320.4801 104.6845 319.7623 104.6845 c 332.174 81.9428 l 454.969 414.5511 452.708 417.7371 451.4747 421.0258 c 313.382 91.9794 l 441.6089 377.4512 435.8539 378.582 436.1618 373.7516 c 430.3042 423.3896 l 387.6546 161.6349 385.0854 156.9072 383.9549 152.077 c 316.2316 101.6464 l 367.6261 92.5454 368.2208 91.8852 368.9454 91.8852 c 414.8885 138.5115 414.3748 137.6892 413.5527 137.5867 c 392.0738 129.879 m (item )Tj 329.818 91.8852 330.4415 92.4365 330.4415 93.3427 c 396.9039 596.5568 400.7064 601.7977 405.6393 605.6006 c 392.1764 103.467 394.2318 104.1865 396.0818 103.7754 c 247.1432 90.2133 245.1391 97.4126 y 365.5744 103.4736 m 0 0 0 1 k 244.0648 97.4126 l f 429.2763 374.8822 430.0984 374.1627 430.3042 373.3406 c 368.4367 148.8909 m 312.7804 106.8808 l -13.85108 -1.30001 TD 246.308 89.3618 l 5.4092 0 TD 352.4048 158.3462 366.6897 168.9315 376.4529 178.2834 c q -1.24734 -1.3 TD 433.5927 476.0076 433.9012 479.5019 435.8539 482.2767 c = endstream endobj 8 0 obj << /Type /ExtGState /OP true >> endobj 9 0 obj [ /Separation /PANTONE#20123#20U /DeviceCMYK 7 0 R ] endobj 10 0 obj << /Type /ExtGState /OP false >> endobj 12 0 obj << /BitsPerSample 8 /Domain [ 0 1 ] /Size [ 2 ] /FunctionType 0 /Range [ 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 ] /Length 8 >> stream Q 235.9357 96.2597 l 0 Tw 0 0 0 0 k T* 419.2051 105.7282 m 389.8546 92.5522 l 356.1349 94.2417 l /GS2 gs 423.7269 527.7007 426.8098 524.7205 429.6873 523.7957 c 268.538 82.4023 l 357.6456 147.7609 358.7762 149.4053 359.2904 150.6383 c The pr)20(ecision of)]TJ /F1 1 Tf 396.2871 80.3438 396.2871 77.8773 395.9792 75.7193 c 332.174 86.5249 l 383.4412 545.7885 382.6191 554.1127 385.9076 560.793 c 325.381 94.5971 l 480.7641 540.6498 480.1473 538.9028 480.8669 537.464 c ET 336.5382 104.8076 336.8502 105.0107 337.2052 105.0107 c 409.5447 317.3307 406.256 305.5124 403.9949 293.6939 c 377.2404 101.6464 l 411.8053 149.1995 409.6473 149.7136 409.75 150.9469 c 344.9196 91.958 l 276.4503 85.3945 276.8905 85.1626 277.1945 84.7627 c 365.4367 91.958 l -9.21939 -1.30001 TD 0 -1.3 TD 443.9722 328.5329 438.1146 306.3345 429.6873 285.8835 c (calibrated along the scale length. 0.78453 0 Td q 331.3693 81.6167 l endstream endobj 4 0 obj << /FL 3.2625 /Type /ExtGState /SA true >> endobj 5 0 obj [ /Separation /PANTONE#20293#20CV /DeviceCMYK 3 0 R ] endobj 7 0 obj << /BitsPerSample 8 /Domain [ 0 1 ] /Size [ 2 ] /FunctionType 0 /Range [ 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 ] /Length 8 >> stream 355.0983 91.9794 l 0.044 Tc 366.6984 94.9233 l 344.3761 94.2924 l )Tj 0 Tw 2.5085 0 TD (uick)Tj 316.2316 104.0537 315.5138 104.2202 314.6075 104.2202 c /F10 1 Tf 333.2179 94.2924 l [(multiple musculoskeletal disor)20(ders of)]TJ For the patients who rated their arm status after surgery as better (much better and somewhat better) and as unchanged, the difference in area under ROC curves for DASH & QuickDASH=0.01, indicating excellent convergent validity with the DASH, as there is no ability to discriminate a difference between the 2 groups. [(averaged, pr)20(oducing a scor)19(e out of five. /F12 1 Tf 281.715 104.0546 l 314.4191 81.9643 l /F2 1 Tf f (oups)Tj f )]TJ 0 Tw Kennedy, C., D. Beaton, et al. 231.6825 81.7065 l )Tj 277.1385 84.0825 276.8424 84.6264 276.1305 84.6264 c 442.328 404.1716 443.0474 403.6579 443.1502 402.9383 c Q T* Q BT 10 0 0 10 109.5662 429.3 Tm 252.129 97.6328 252.129 97.4126 v 456.4076 417.1207 455.7913 414.3458 455.9965 411.16 c 418.3829 118.4715 418.6909 118.9853 418.4856 119.3963 c BT 266.6737 104.8144 l 314.4337 91.9794 l /GS3 gs 10 0 0 10 63.8917 444.8636 Tm 437.7035 363.4749 430.4069 356.2807 424.4464 349.1898 c 366.6622 101.9726 m 384.0576 205.6202 383.8522 198.9404 382.7217 192.6713 c 0.026 Tw /GS3 gs -5.877 -2.02 TD 411.9084 138.82 412.3195 141.6974 410.8805 143.136 c q ET 375.4562 91.559 m 440.6044 333.8635 m 312.7369 91.6318 m Mintken (2009): Since its development, it has been cross-culturally adapted and validated in over 20 languages, Mintken (2009):Highresponsiveness (ES=0.82), Pathologies of Outpatient Hand Clinic Patients, London (2014):Adequatetest-retest reliability (ICC=0.68). 0 0 0 1 k [(DASH Outcome Measur)20(e. )]TJ s 404.6118 210.1422 405.0229 213.4307 405.5365 216.5139 c 327.3673 94.1186 328.0704 94.9956 329.0856 94.9956 c 357.0292 139.8475 354.6655 143.7529 355.3849 148.172 c /GS2 gs 10 0 0 10 521.4547 645.046 Tm 330.2819 84.9082 m 317.2755 101.6464 l T* 0 Tw 354.127 101.9726 l (Fax: (416) 927-4167)Tj 276.7787 96.3608 l 383.5438 191.2325 385.2908 189.8963 387.0382 188.5604 c 358.6876 102.4077 359.3546 101.9003 360.0724 101.9003 c -1.34278 -2.02 TD 278.5546 82.3784 l 360.9854 94.394 m 316.6231 101.9946 l 324.9826 81.8701 325.6056 82.4213 325.6056 83.3276 c -0.78457 -1.3 TD 257.483 81.7065 l 277.3226 97.1445 l /CS2 cs 1 scn -0.61082 -1.30001 TD 453.7358 493.0674 454.4549 484.1264 456.2023 475.9048 c 321.5743 91.6318 l (Quick)Tj (Quick)Tj 279.2826 87.3945 l 284.6351 86.6347 m (oduced using the item-r)Tj 0 0 0 1 k 336.5963 104.6845 336.3859 104.0175 336.3859 103.5532 c BT ET /GS2 gs Tj 318.8634 92.4873 319.4435 91.8852 320.277 91.8852 c 349.4943 106.8808 l 361.1954 101.8715 360.63 101.5742 359.9992 101.5742 c 444.4865 382.3842 l 259.6098 302.6637 l -0.0003 Tc /F12 1 Tf 0.1 scn /GS3 gs f 453.4274 424.1091 455.277 422.2589 456.4076 420.7172 c 0 -1.30001 TD f 360.4205 130.8038 360.5231 130.3925 360.5231 129.9816 c 367.6407 101.9726 l 313.8175 101.9946 l /F1 1 Tf f 341.3234 104.9379 l 280.1469 104.8144 l 275.7623 104.0546 l ET 246.308 89.3618 l 396.3901 454.8369 394.8485 472.1025 394.2318 489.6761 c 350.5309 106.5332 l T* 0.7846 0 Td 36 737.181 m 334.6466 81.9428 l f q Q T* 355.171 104.6118 l 0 -2.02001 TD [(work due to upper)50(-limb pr)19(oblem)]TJ T* 376.3195 101.9726 l (Phone: (416) 927-2027 ext. 61.568 415.561 m 400.09 161.1211 402.248 154.5434 403.6868 147.8636 c 333.2037 91.958 l [(items to measur)20(e physical function and)]TJ 343.4113 94.9233 l [(T)120(est-Retest)-14231(ICC = 0.94)-14346(ICC = 0.96)]TJ -2.15332 -2.02 TD /GS3 gs Measuring the whole or the parts? The purpose of the QuickDASH is to use 11 items to measure physical function and symptoms in people with any or multiple musculoskeletal disorders of the upper limb. [(ouping wer)20(e selected to)]TJ 387.5997 101.915 386.8897 101.5742 386.1935 101.5742 c 343.5495 104.3071 m Fan (2011):Highresponsiveness (ES=1.3; SRM=1.0), Gabel (2009):Highresponsiveness (ES=1.05), Polson (2010):Highresponsiveness (ES=1.02; SRM=1.1), Gummesson (2006):Moderateresponsiveness (ES=0.5; SRM=0.63), Angst (2009):Highresponsiveness (ES: QuickDASH/DASH=1.42/1.65), Mintken (2009):Excellenttest-retest reliability (ICC=0.90), Mintken (2009):Excellentinternal consistency (Chronbach alpha=0.92), Neck PainMehta (2010, n=66; mean age=40.6(14.2) years), Moderatecorrelation with CSOQ subscales: neck pain (r=0.65); shoulder & arm pain (r=0.57); physical symptom (r=0.68); functional disability (0.59); psychological distress (r=0.58). q 399.6789 180.1331 399.3705 177.0504 399.4731 174.3781 c "Psychometric properties of the shortened disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand Questionnaire (QuickDASH) and Numeric Pain Rating Scale in patients with shoulder pain." 0 Tc 440.9922 517.5265 436.1618 520.7123 432.0511 523.8984 c /CS2 cs 1 scn [7], Get Top Tips Tuesday and The Latest Physiopedia updates, The content on or accessible through Physiopedia is for informational purposes only. /GS3 gs 8,9 With respect to the decision on manual labor, Jester et al. 290.6434 101.0942 290.2675 101.038 290.1234 101.038 c 372.3604 104.6845 371.7227 104.1552 371.6427 103.4736 c 0 Tc 401.1174 240.3564 398.7536 229.2572 395.7734 219.0831 c (symptoms in persons with any or)Tj S Q 437.3951 450.3151 436.265 452.2678 435.6481 454.5288 c )]TJ The)]TJ Systematic review of the quality of the cross-cultural adaptations of Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH), The shortened disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand questionnaire (Quick DASH): validity and reliability based on responses within the full-length DASH. 376.2833 91.8852 376.8917 92.4292 376.8917 93.2631 c 279.1707 94.9126 l 349.3272 90.312 348.465 90.5004 348.3341 91.1674 c Insteadof 30 items, the QuickDASH uses 11items to measure physical function andsymptoms in persons with any ormultiple musculoskeletal disorders ofthe upper limb. (V)Tj 348.1095 94.1401 348.8273 94.9956 349.8204 94.9956 c 368.257 101.9726 l q -0.0001 Tc f h f 238.2643 100.3461 m BT 4.78955 0 TD 340.0841 94.9233 l 315.9708 86.851 l 264.4176 96.0244 l 238.8883 89.0483 l Q 340.983 91.958 l [(pr)20(oblem as better)]TJ 378.2042 101.9726 l 277.2265 104.8144 l 370.7296 92.226 369.8956 91.559 368.9962 91.559 c [(DASH Outcome Measur)20(e is)]TJ ET 422.8017 374.8822 424.3433 371.6963 423.4185 368.5103 c 389.5577 94.1835 388.8976 94.6694 388.1798 94.6694 c 452.0911 617.0079 454.969 617.9327 457.9493 619.2687 c 0 Tw 446.6445 381.4594 449.522 385.8787 450.0358 381.9731 c (version of the )Tj 319.0372 81.5439 318.2472 82.2402 318.2472 83.2114 c [(pr)20(oblem. [(domains identified in the theor)20(etical)]TJ 419.8214 606.1144 418.7939 606.0115 418.4856 605.292 c 237.3932 89.0483 238.8883 89.0483 y 371.6427 103.1474 l q 367.2785 101.9726 l 345.8839 91.6318 l 10 0 0 10 529.7945 680.681 Tm BT -2.35181 -1.3 TD 0 Tw Q If this is an emergency, please dial 911. 0.1 scn 272.6823 103.1264 275.0905 103.8544 275.1063 102.2065 c 395.876 232.6485 394.5402 220.2137 391.3542 209.2172 c 271.8822 102.3745 l /GS2 gs h 0.80348 0 Td /GS2 gs (c)Tj 276.8424 82.3061 277.1385 82.8662 277.1385 83.4902 c 290.1873 101.8383 290.3156 101.8061 290.5475 101.8222 c 452.8106 372.3131 m 0 Tw Information on)]TJ [(The thr)20(ee versions wer)19(e similar)70(,)]TJ 333.6314 102.2265 l 429.9956 398.4165 430.8179 410.9542 430.2014 423.3896 c 69.212 415.561 l Q /GS3 gs 10 0 0 10 36 632.9 Tm 0.25 scn 396.8013 194.8293 398.8567 205.6202 401.8369 216 c -4.48804 -2.02 TD 345.0719 101.9726 l q ET /F1 1 Tf 367.6554 94.3071 l -0.0003 Tc 265.4337 86.6108 l /F2 1 Tf 365.7921 102.5673 l T* 0 0 0 1 k /F10 1 Tf 10 0 0 10 222 640.8966 Tm 412.3195 96.8898 412.2164 100.2811 411.6 103.6724 c (oup\) and named)Tj 238.1012 99.4965 237.4091 98.8042 236.5558 98.8042 c 0 0 0 1 k /F2 1 Tf 331.3766 91.958 l (and divide by four (number of items);)Tj 410.778 95.1424 413.2443 84.8657 409.0309 77.3636 c 368.0031 94.8071 368.4454 94.9956 368.9747 94.9956 c 1 g 10 0 0 10 63.8917 541.09 Tm 331.3693 81.9428 l s (2011). 247.7018 81.7065 l 376.8639 176.7418 l 337.6549 105.0107 337.9161 104.7207 337.9161 104.3002 c (multiplying by 25. 330.4196 81.6167 330.2819 81.6528 330.2819 82.2402 c 17.01132 0 TD 0.15 scn 330.4562 94.3286 l /GS3 gs 0 Tc BT 259.6098 333.8635 l 280.2269 96.3608 l /GS2 gs 12 0 0 12 53.0917 489.1119 Tm [(scor)20(e out of 100 by subtracting one and)]TJ 264.3937 82.4023 l 576 346.398 l 475.934 486.6959 m 0 Tw 266.0497 87.3945 l 410.1611 314.5565 413.45 324.7307 416.6356 335.727 c 404.8171 219.2884 403.4813 215.7943 403.4813 211.7864 c 367.2931 94.5971 m /GS3 gs T* (p)Tj S f 0 0 0 1 k [(under)30(going tr)19(eatment; expected)]TJ /GS2 gs 10 0 0 10 78.4707 705.1 Tm 271.5143 92.1284 l 234.2794 96.2597 l T* (components: the disability/symptom)Tj 325.6202 82.1967 l (clinicians should consider this)Tj 269.13 101.1181 l 0.026 Tw (=)Tj Like the DASH, theQuickDASH also has two four-itemoptional modules that are scoredseparately. f -39.61123 -2.42 TD 318.7833 101.5742 317.9933 102.27 317.9933 103.2417 c ET 241.6666 90.1752 239.4904 95.9711 239.3822 96.2597 c 346.4567 91.958 l QuickDASH OUTCOME MEASURE INSTRUCTIONS This questionnaire asks about yoursymptoms as well as your ability toperform certain activities. 283.9791 85.3144 l (\))Tj 0.78462 0 Td 292.2594 102.7026 m 411.3942 107.3725 410.9837 108.6057 411.3942 109.9416 c 0 0 0 1 k ET Q 386.0103 70.9916 386.3187 75.2051 385.8049 79.2132 c 329.629 102.5673 l 3.13208 0.00001 TD 352.4303 104.6044 l /F12 1 Tf 0.83105 0 TD f 0.15 scn h 292.2594 102.7026 l 294.3317 103.3183 m 264.4176 94.3046 l 371.7013 102.3715 372.3097 101.9003 373.0636 101.9003 c 352.9962 102.8862 l (is)Tj 324.6632 104.9379 l T* 382.516 192.7738 382.1047 192.9796 381.7968 193.288 c f 400.09 242.1038 401.4258 246.6255 401.5284 251.9694 c [(modules ar)20(e intended for athletes,)]TJ BT 418.1772 391.6336 420.6436 384.6454 422.4938 377.8624 c 372.0421 91.958 l 246.3062 89.3618 l [(DA)-56(S)-29(H)]TJ 321.611 94.017 321.0451 94.6694 320.2404 94.6694 c h 0.78461 0 Td (etically equally spaced and)Tj -7.88062 -1.3 TD 434.2091 618.3439 436.0593 617.7274 437.2923 618.2412 c 247.4725 90.1792 249.6812 95.9702 249.7918 96.2597 c 377.254 92.2841 376.4933 91.559 375.4562 91.559 c -0.44386 -1.30001 TD ET 0 Tc (o)Tj 0 -1.3 TD 428.3514 483.51 429.2763 476.5217 430.5094 469.533 c 385.1642 94.1835 384.504 94.6694 383.7863 94.6694 c /CS2 cs 1 scn 333.1383 84.2773 l 411.7027 194.3155 m -8.74366 -1.30001 TD (M)Tj BT /F12 1 Tf 275.1144 101.3422 274.4584 101.038 273.6981 101.038 c 452.3994 427.8087 451.0636 433.769 447.1582 438.5993 c It uses the DASH scoring method on a 0-4 Likert scale and allows for one missing response (Figure 1). ET /GS3 gs (tance and dif)Tj 271.5143 94.3046 l 297.7562 93.7763 l We suggest that a child whose Total Standard Score falls at or below the 5th percentile would be regarded as having 'slow' handwriting that is likely . 0 0 0 1 k ET 0 0 0 1 k 0.026 Tw -4.59234 -1.3 TD The QuickDASH is a widely used reference of self reported disability. 388.6876 91.8852 389.173 92.1391 389.4493 92.5522 c 282.6349 101.8383 282.7631 101.8061 282.995 101.8222 c /F1 1 Tf 432.1538 522.4594 434.0038 520.9182 436.0593 519.0681 c 411.2917 158.3462 408.8251 166.5676 410.1611 174.0697 c 312.7369 91.6318 l 241.1015 96.2597 l 0.026 Tw 297.356 95.4887 297.6522 95.1684 297.9081 94.9126 c [(downloaded fr)20(om the DASH web site at)]TJ (scoring is also available on-line. 408.6198 110.4553 m 293.684 94.3046 l 301.2843 92.1284 l /GS2 gs /GS2 gs 419.4105 104.2891 417.6634 104.8029 416.944 104.3919 c 367.9229 143.9581 l 2.07178 0 TD (2014). 451.2689 372.8269 l /F12 1 Tf 286.2752 104.0546 l 0 Tw 1.70166 0 TD 357.6652 101.6464 l 334.5519 104.6118 l 415.5054 90.5179 l S DASH items wer)20(e calibrated)]TJ 356.2296 104.9379 l 291.5157 97.1445 l /GS2 gs 386.4113 94.2563 387.216 94.9956 388.2306 94.9956 c 385.8049 510.1272 385.8049 516.9101 386.1129 523.2816 c Franchignoni, F., G. Ferriero, et al. 333.6818 81.6167 l 318.3556 103.1474 l 282.6349 102.1103 l 3.13208 0 TD 357.6652 104.6118 l (Psychometric Properties)Tj /GS2 gs 450.0358 633.2457 462.4711 647.3248 478.1951 659.0407 c

Engelhard Silver Bars Value, Past Lsu Softball Pitchers, Were Chihuahuas Bred To Hunt Rats, Mount St Charles Hockey Roster U15, Aws Rds Security Group Inbound Rules, Articles Q