jeffrey rignall testimony transcript

Defendant next complains that his trial counsel was incompetent for failing to present any evidence on the statutory mitigating factor of extreme mental or emotional disturbance. Dr. Eliseo had been asked by defense counsel to examine defendant and make a diagnosis without reviewing any of the information thus far gathered in the case, ostensibly for the reason that they did not wish him to be "prejudiced" by this information. In certain instances, where defense counsel asked the court to question the prospective jurors further on the insanity defense, the court did so. The circuit court did not err in permitting the People to open and close the arguments at the sentencing hearing. Defendant also complains that he should have been permitted more than the 20 peremptory challenges allowed by statute. JUSTICE GOLDENHERSH delivered the opinion of the court: In indictments returned in the circuit court of Cook County, defendant, John Wayne Gacy, was charged with 33 counts of murder, one count of deviate sexual assault, one count of indecent liberties with a child, and one count of aggravated kidnaping. Defendant then grabbed Rignall's head and shoved his penis into Rignall's mouth, shouting: "You love it, you love it," with a tone of voice used by a drill instructor. While Dr. Ney did suggest that he had insufficient information to determine which of the five counties outside of Cook County had the least amount of prejudicial publicity, the reason for suggesting that Cook County's publicity was prejudicial *43 was that the crime occurred in Cook County. Defendant *108 was, however, represented by counsel and until his appearance in this court had made no request to be permitted to defend himself. His story, Sunday, when Donnie Wahlberg. Defendant has also complained that he should have been allowed to hear in person why the court imposed natural life sentences upon him and also to witness the summary denial of his motion for a new trial. I will be good." After the movie, defendant stuck his foot in Donnelly's stomach, put a gun to Donnelly's head, and played "Russian roulette." When defendant *36 did ask that the remainder of the voir dire be closed to the public, he did so only on the bare assertion that prospective jurors were not being fully candid. The film receipt which was found in a waste basket in defendant's home showed that film had been left for development at Nisson's Pharmacy and would tend to show that he had been in the *26 pharmacy. Dr. Cavanaugh expressed the opinion that defendant understood his behavior sufficiently to control it, or at least get help, but Dr. Cavanaugh conceded that defendant's ability to control his behavior was impaired in the sense that it was below that of the average person. We decline to reconsider that decision on the basis of defendant's argument here. The People note that defense counsel, during opening argument, asserted that all the victims shared "certain sexual preferences." jeffrey rignall testimony transcriptfirst gen cummins for sale in oklahoma jeffrey rignall testimony transcript. There are authorities which hold that the statements made by the accused to the examining psychiatrist should be admitted. He explained that the description of narcissistic personality contains many of the elements of the antisocial personality, and that the antisocial personality is a subtype of narcissistic personality. We see no basis upon which to find that a formal written presentence investigation report would alter the judge's determination on the facts of this case. VI, sec. They began with the frequently emotional accounts of relatives and friends of some of the victims. Defendant then "patched up" Ried's head. The second effect was the "halo" effect, or the concept that the manner in which information is presented could affect the reader's understanding *41 of that information's content. The "subtypes" of narcissistic and antisocial borderline personalities were also part of the same characterization. 9-1(d); see Liptak v. Security Benefit Association (1932), 350 Ill. Defendant asserts that, because this information was not contained in the complaint, this court may not make reference to this information in determining whether the complaint established probable cause. Defendant contends that he had insufficient information to determine whether Winnebago County had been unduly influenced by prejudicial publicity and that this constitutes reversible error. The court stated that neither side could raise an irrelevant issue and instructed the jury to disregard the colloquy because it was irrelevant to the issues of the case. Thus, none of the written instructions were incorrect, but a discrepancy existed in the oral instructions. Citing People v. Steptore (1972), 51 Ill. 2d 208, 216, and People v. Pfanschmidt (1914), 262 Ill. 411, defendant argues that a witness may not be impeached on a collateral matter and that "the test of collateralness is whether the fact for which the testimony is offered in contradiction of a witness' testimony could have been shown in evidence for any purpose independent of the alleged contradiction." The fact that even the earlier newspaper accounts suggest that defendant had a significant mental disturbance supports the assertion that defendant's *30 attorneys could have immediately concluded that an insanity defense would be the most realistic defense in this case. Investigator Bedoe testified on cross-examination that defendant openly admitted that he was bisexual, but expressed a tremendous fear of being a homosexual. Although the ring did not bear Piest's initials, the police officer conducting the search may not have immediately noticed the initials on the ring, and, in any event, the police were aware, at this time, that defendant could very well be a habitual sex offender and that more than one victim could be involved. In addition, four bodies were recovered from the Des Plaines and Illinois rivers, downstream from the place where defendant had told the police that he threw the bodies. This court rejected that argument in People ex rel. When asked how he could determine from one interview whether defendant was psychotic at certain points in time, Dr. Eliseo stated that he would determine the general personality characteristics and structure of defendant and then "project back. Dr. Freedman, whose qualifications spanned over 30 pages of transcript, reviewed defendant's statements in explaining his diagnosis to the jury. Several members of defendant's family and childhood friends testified concerning defendant's past. Thats why he wanted to catch him.. 9, had an incised area on the upper portion of the fifth rib and two incised areas on the left lateral of the sternum which were consistent with stab wounds. We also note that immediate sequestration would have placed a great burden on the jurors, who may have been able to use the week to organize their personal affairs before leaving town for a lengthy trial. 1979, ch. Defendant carried Rignall into his house and offered him a drink. Jeffrey tait un rsident de Louisville, dans le Kentucky, lorsqu'il se rendait dans un bar gay de Chicago, dans l'Illinois, en mars 1978. 2d 248, 255, 102 S. Ct. 2613, 2618; Richmond Newspapers, Inc. v. Virginia (1980), 448 U.S. 555, 558-81, 65 L. Ed. Defendant's objection to the characterization of mitigating factors as statutory guidelines was also not error here, as it fairly described the function of the statutory mitigating factors. (People v. Jones (1982), 94 Ill. 2d 275, 282-86.) Defendant, in his reply brief, asserts that he never abandoned his claim of innocence because "at jury selection and at the time of jury instructions the jury was informed that there were two issues to be resolved: guilt and sanity." Defendant has also contended that his sentences must be vacated and the cause remanded for resentencing because the court sentenced him without the benefit of a presentence investigation report. Gacy was arrested, but quickly released on a minor bond. Ill. Rev. How Did. That the complaint does not set forth in detail how one of these individuals was able to identify John Gacy as the contractor with whom Piest went to speak is not a fatal defect. Defendant's next disagreement with the court's questioning concerns the prospective jurors' opinions as to defendant's guilt. Defendant then told Donnelly to dress, put Donnelly in his car, and told him it would be his last ride. On this record the instruction was sufficient to render harmless any effect which the testimony may have caused, and we find no error which warrants reversal. Defendant next contends that there were many instances where the People engaged in improper closing argument. Officer Phillip Bettiker testified that defendant said that Piest said that he would do almost anything for a great deal of money. Wilder describes the horrifying injuries Rignall suffered from the attack. However, he had confused thinking which "resembles to a large extent people who would be classified as schizophrenic * * *." Thomas Eliseo, a clinical psychologist, testified that defendant scored in the top 10% of the population on the Wechsler scale and had no major brain damage. Defendant asserts that defense counsel were required to bring out defendant's statements in cross-examination *73 of the People's experts because they "had to keep in mind that the judge had repeatedly ruled that the State experts could refer to statements made by the defendant to justify their conclusions." (People v. Carlson (1980), 79 Ill. 2d 564, 580, quoting People v. Ward (1975), 61 Ill. 2d 559, 568.) Although Dr. Rappaport was precluded from testifying concerning statements made by defendant about his life history or why he behaved in a particular manner, he explained, in a narrative form, defendant's developmental history as compiled in police reports and interviews with defendant's relatives and childhood friends and how events have influenced his development. jeffrey rignall testimony transcript. The prospective juror stated that from what he had heard and seen he did not come to the conclusion that defendant had committed the offenses in question. We are of the opinion that the testimony concerning O'Rourke's disappearance, when considered with defendant's statement as to where he picked up one of his victims, the location of the body in the Des Plaines River, the physical condition of the body when found, and defendant's statement that he threw five bodies in the river, in light of all the evidence in this case, was sufficient to permit the jury to conclude that defendant had murdered Timothy O'Rourke and the People had proved this beyond a reasonable doubt. We are of the opinion that the instruction was properly refused. Citing People v. Brownell (1980), 79 Ill. 2d 508, the People argue that the decision at sentencing in a capital case is a balancing process in which the seriousness of the crime must be weighed against whatever mitigating factors exist. There is little conflict in the evidence, and the question presented was what inference could appropriately be drawn therefrom. In the course of the investigation defendant admitted that he had killed approximately 30 individuals, some buried in the crawl space under his home and five thrown into the Des Plaines River. The testimony at the hearing on the motion to suppress showed that Des Plaines police officers had spoken with Kim Byers and that she had said that she was wearing Robert Piest's jacket when she filled out the photo-finishing envelope, ripped off the receipt, and placed it in the jacket pocket. While the evidence indicated that defendant's father was an alcoholic, was disapproving, and physically abusive to both defendant and his mother, defendant did have a loving mother and loving siblings. We disagree. According to People Pill, his reported cause of death was . The defense called two other psychiatrists. Mementos of jeffrey rignall testimony transcript of human legs were subscribers to the changing evaluations of peter the famous essays on the pharmacy. On cross-examination, Dr. Eliseo stated that after defendant had committed the crime, he would understand that what he did was wrong, but at the times of committing the crimes, he was not aware of the criminality of his act. He testified that the problem with psychoanalytic theory is that it requires an inference about mental processes which is not susceptible to proof. He told police that the victims had all sold their bodies for $20 and that they had killed themselves.

How To Add Custom Links In Salesforce Lightning, Bengals Hall Of Fame Inductees, Articles J