dynamic gold x7 vs x100st elizabeth family medicine residency utica, ny
(E.g., pulling a pw or 6i back to the fringe from pin high can be disheartening at times). It's also about 8g heavier than a normal tapered tip X-100 shaft. Specifications. X7 has the exact same step pattern, but the steps are much thicker, allowing for increased butt stiffness to go along with the stiff tip that has been the hallmark of the Dynamic series of shafts. [/quote] Crazy huh? [quote name='J.W.' timestamp='1355707584' post='6078545'] There is about a 12 gram difference between the X7 and X100. timestamp='1355720559' post='6079617'] You are looking at less than a 1CPM increase. To keep shaft weights as close to identical as possible, True Temper Dynamic Gold Tour Issue is measured to plus-or-minus half a gram, which is as tight as you can get with a steel shaft in the. Haha I understand about the family thing I used to do long drive a few years ago. Hope you find a great fit! How about Project X LZ 5.5/6.0 vs. Nippon Pro Modus 3 Tour 120 S vs. KBS Tour 120 S? DGTour vs DG if you go by the website there does not appear to be much of a difference other then they are sorted better and thus held to better specifications. I have 3 years of Golf blogging experience and always ensure that my articles are accurate and original. [/quote] [/quote] Wow, so the X7's are 400, plus about 25 a club to get installed with a grip X 8 clubs = $600. For most articles, I utilize the resources given by the USGA and R&A. The design of True Tempers basic Dynamic shaft hasn't changed in decades. Generally I like heavier offerings. True Temper has lost their minds. I'd love to try X7, but reality is telling me that my next set will have 7.0s. If you are in the market for a tour grade shaft then congratulations that probably means you are an accomplished player. timestamp='1355704696' post='6078353'] I think the real question is how does the x7 stack up against PX 7.0. I just laugh at everyone who is scratch who think they are pretty good. Golf Blue Heron is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. I'm off to hit scratch!.yes, in less than 2 years! [/quote] They are on par with the PX 7.0's in terms of firmness. [/quote] Nothing personal. You can lower the launch by hardstepping X-100, but you will not get the spin reduction that DG Tour provides. To players who fight to keep spin down, any gain might be considered way less. [/quote] This is for a set of Tour Issue Dynamic Gold Iron or Wedge Shafts As always everything we sell comes with a free gift, full warranty and a satisfaction guarantee. We actually thought the Dynamic Gold X100 was lighter than 130 grams. I started posting on golf forums early on before I ever was in the position I am now and wish someone would have told me these things so I didn't go out and switch clubs and shafts as much as I could trying to chase something that wasn't there. 100 % of 100. timestamp='1355712569' post='6078973'] Nothing personal. Welcome to another edition of Fully Equipped, an interactive GOLF.com series in which our resident dimplehead (a.k.a., GOLFs managing editor of equipment, Jonathan Wall) fields your hard-hitting equipment questions. Your email address will not be published. Know anywhere else that's cheaper? C Taper (close 2nd) next then X7 as the lowest. so an x100 would be suited for a person? My hope is that the differences in shaft profile is overcome by the additional stiffness on the 7.0 so that the two fly pretty much the same but lower spin on the 7.0. 2023 Mexico Open money: Total purse, payout breakdown, winners share, How to watch the 2023 Mexico Open on Sunday: Round 4 live coverage, 2023 Mexico Open tee times: Round 4 groupings for Sunday, 2023 Mexico Open at Vidanta: How to watch, TV schedule, streaming, tee times, Meet the new GOLF Top 100 Teachers of America, These floral golf shoes are gorgeous *and* packed with performance features. I'm glad to hear you like the x7's and you have something you found that works for your game! I'm off to hit scratch!.yes, in less than 2 years! Putter : Nike Method 003 Oven. I heard your tone in your previous comments and overlooked it for info. The main difference is in the diameter of these shafts. By They were noticeably firm, and launched low, but overall the feel was really nice and the performance was manageable. [quote name='driverwedge' timestamp='1355716963' post='6079391'] That's a whole nuther thread. DG Tour (X7) is worth the money if you need it. | Fully Equipped mailbag. Honestly, I really liked the x7's. Shawn shows you why strong grips dont hook the ball and how a simple adjustment will have you belting it past the 300-yard mark. I like the Rifles better than the LZ model, but a lot of golfers game the gentler LZ and love it. Regular (R300), Stiff (S200-300-400), X-Stiff (X100) Material: Steel: Tip DIameter.355 Taper Tip: Trajectiory/Spin: Low: Weight Class: More than 115g: Color: Silver: PRODUCTS. timestamp='1355716836' post='6079379'] Also, lower on both fronts than X200/X300. Thanks for the reality check on tipping the x100's and saving me some time even thinking about it. GolfWRX_Spotted posted a topic in Tour and Pre-Release Equipment, April 24, GolfWRX_Spotted posted a topic in Tour and Pre-Release Equipment, April 17, GolfWRX_Spotted posted a topic in Tour and Pre-Release Equipment, April 10, GolfWRX_Spotted posted a topic in Tour and Pre-Release Equipment, March 27, GolfWRX_Spotted posted a topic in Tour and Pre-Release Equipment, March 20, By I just laugh at everyone who is scratch who think they are pretty good. By the way, what's a Lee Jazen? The designs of certain golf shafts can promote more or less spin so keep this in mind when looking for a shaft to maximize your game. Your ball will never balloon out of control and flight is highly controllable. Because Tour players are far more discerning when it comes to their clubs, a difference of plus-or-minus two grams can be noticed by a professional. The store will not work correctly in the case when cookies are disabled. I'm the first to say it may be a swing fault first, but I wonder if equipment like the x7 would help support more consistancy and minimize the extra spin and higher than desirable launch I often get from my short irons. [/quote] You can post now and register later. Their results may vary from yours - context is key. [quote name='J.W.' Same results for both of us- 7.0 highest. Available now, or soon from TT Tour Concept dealers. Well I never heard of him. In other words, with a longer shaft, like the X100, you will be able to hit longer shots, but they will likely be less consistent or accurate. Dynamic Gold X Seven X7 Iron Shafts. They weigh the same +/- 1g but don't spin less than X7. [quote name='driverwedge' timestamp='1355716718' post='6079367'] DG Tours are exceptional. [/b] That may help paint a picture of how they work based on a known swing, tempo and player in general. You just have no idea. Check out the video to learn what this means for your golf swing. . Here's a question for you: Are you still able to hit higher launching shots on command with the x7's or is it much more difficult? The X7s are 20g heavier than these. I also didnt realize how expensive they were. Tour Experience Golf Testing the KBS Tour C-Taper 130, Project X 7.0, True Temper Dynamic Gold X100, and True Temper Dynamic Gold X7 to see the differences in feel, timing, ball flight, spin rate, launch angle, and more! Do these lines sound familiar? [b]Would you happen to know what names in the pro golf world play them? My name is Al, I have been golfing for about 15 years. I tried them and absolutely loved them. I'll say this- the X7 absolutely launches lower and spins WAY less than the C Taper. I'll learn this game soon enough. Both are designed with the same step pattern (tapered) but the DG Tour has thicker steps and a larger butt section that X-100. X7 has the exact same step pattern, but the steps are much thicker, allowing for increased butt stiffness to go along with the stiff tip that has been the hallmark of the Dynamic series of shafts. I've never had any issue spinning anything so I thought I'd give them a shot. Same results for both. This high-flex, tour weight shaft is designed for skilled players seeking a low, penetrating ball flight for optimum control and accuracy. Stage and DriverWedge have experience with both. well assuming you get your old iron shafts pulled, from golfsmith it costs 19.99 + grip which is about 7 bucks, from golf galaxy it's 17 to install, about 4 to pull, 3 to put on a new grip, plus the 7 dollar grip. I would agree with that but the X7's are almost a full flex stiffer (6.7 in the X100 vs. 7.5 in the X7's). You can check my sig for specifics. Also, lower on both fronts than X200/X300. I'll answer your last question first. MEMBER REVIEWS: Cleveland Frontline Elite Putters! While it may not seem like that big of a difference, there may be some minor changes that these shafts make to your game. Tipping X-100 1/4" is not worth your time. Feel wise, it's almost like going from S200 to S400, they feel stiffer but not a crazy amount. If you are looking for a lighter golf shaft, the X100 is better for you. Thank you! Butt trim shafts to finished length after tip trimming. [quote name='MadGolfer76' timestamp='1355718783' post='6079509'] You've fit hundreds of players into x7's? Cleveland TA milled 1i. Believe it or not, the USGA has very strict rules on the type of equipment that can be used in the game of golf. They aren't for everyone. Lee Janzen played them, that's how much it matters to really worry about iron shafts. Now I am only talking about the basic Dynamic heavy weight shaft. Mizuno M-Craft I Blue Ion 365g / Stability Shaft. To me, the X7 is another flex up. To figure out whether or not the About the author! [quote name='savoyspecial13' timestamp='1355726505' post='6079833'] This season I backed off in flex a little (not playing as much, and am as big as a house), but am working towards replacing all my shafts. I still do. If I had 4 bills lying around I would try them again. I think you may have misinterpreted the threads as such and you yourself have 'jumped into' a critical conclusion. If you have a moderate to fast tempo and a swing speed at or above 95 MPH, you will likely love the control you get from this shaft. [quote name='J.W.' I heard your tone in your previous comments and overlooked it for info. The Dynamic Gold S400 is the standard stiff flex shaft of the True Temper collection. The Dynamic Gold X7 is really only for scratch players and amateurs with 95+ MPH swing speeds. That's quite a bit for a steel shaft change but its not a dramatic difference at the end of the day. [/quote] I will describe them this way, and I'm a feel player, Heavy(heavier)-exceptionally tight dispersion-surprisingly lively. Clement: Starting beginners with half golf balls (!?). They spun about 200-300 rpm less than X100 for me in a 6 iron. I think the real question is how does the x7 stack up against PX 7.0. The #1 shaft in golf. XXIO X Series 5 Wood! What is WAY less? Unless you can honestly say that you launch X-100 too high and spin it too much, they won't be worth your money. You cannot paste images directly. If I had 4 bills lying around I would try them again. [quote name='J.W.' These guys are so full of crap its scary. In terms of flex, both only offer the extra stiff option. "The Dynamic Gold X100 is one of the Tour Issue shafts in the Dynamic Gold series." This is a tour-weighted steel shaft that gives better players the accuracy and distance they need. The launch slightly lower than X-100 but definitely reduce spin. I love learning about different rules and equipment surrounding the world of golf. I know I know. SHAFT: What do you game now out of curiosity? For example, after recently switching to x100's, breaking par is only a couple of strokes away now. I guess just wait for pulls if you can find them, but then you're not sure of the quality. Yeah, it's fun to meinteresting to me. If you are looking for a slightly lower launch trajectory and a bit more control over your shots, the X100 is a better fit. An example of data being processed may be a unique identifier stored in a cookie. Going from Burner 2.0 stock 85 gram regular to X7, sure the difference in feel is so great that a player that needs something much stiffer will make manipulations in his swing. A heavier golf shaft typically allows golfers to be more consistent with their golf shots. Founder of Pure Distance Golf and theDrive 400 Swing-Speed Program. Dam, 4 bills? I'm the first to say it may be a swing fault first, but I wonder if equipment like the x7 would help support more consistancy and minimize the extra spin and higher than desirable launch I often get from my short irons. Probably the best iron shafts around if they fit you but you will pay a lot for them even if you can find a set. You can find x200/x300 shafts on eBay for like 50-70 bucks per set. Butt: .600". Happy to help! When we tested the Dynamic Gold X7, we could also feel that it was the stiffest and strongest shaft in the Dynamic Gold line. I know PX's are supposed to launch higher, but I'm having trouble believing something at FCM 7.5 lauches THAT high. Dam, 4 bills? and Taylormade Stealth Plus (9) - Tensei 1K Pro Orange 60, Taylormade Stealth Plus (15) - Tensei 1K Pro Orange 70, Taylormade Stealth Plus (19) - Tensei 1K Pro Orange 80. Titleist Vokey SM8 Black 54.12D / Nippon Super Peening Blue X Stage-stepped, Titleist Vokey SM8 Black 58.14K / Nippon Super Peening Blue X Stage-stepped Currently have X7's in my apex pros but was recently thinking about giving the x100's a shot. They are on par with the PX 7.0's in terms of firmness. Like Mad said before, they are certainly more playable than they would appear based on the specs. Try everything and see what fits you. I don't know where my swing speed is right now - I am no slouch, but I am pretty sure it isn't consistently over 115 either. In actuality, the difference is usually a slight shape or weight modification that only someone with a discerning eye of hypersensitive feel could pick up on. So, no matter which one you go with you are going to be limited to the extra stiff option. [quote name='stage1350' timestamp='1355698199' post='6077849'] I was just trying to help, sorry MadGolfer!!!!!! timestamp='1355716836' post='6079379'] Clear editor. Good luck! I tried them and absolutely loved them. Ok. Let us know how you hit them! A Lee Janzen is a short hitting fellow that has been playing longer than 1.5 years, he won 2 United States Opens and over $15,000,000 playing this game . I've hit them all very close to each other. Going from Burner 2.0 stock 85 gram regular to X7, sure the difference in feel is so great that a player that needs something much stiffer will make manipulations in his swing. No issues with that. The Tour Golds are even more closely weight matched. To players who fight to keep spin down, any gain might be considered way less. The X100 only has a 45 inch option. I also didnt realize how expensive they were. They spun about 200-300 rpm less than X100 for me in a 6 iron. Thanks again! [/quote] [/quote] What do you game now out of curiosity? For the average person, even a low handicapper, the extra expense is a waste of money in my opinion. Good luck! A player with a quicker backswing and more aggressive transition will have a faster tempo, while a player with a slower backswing and smoother transition will have a more deliberate tempo.